Mythri Sarjapur gallery

Mythri Builders has released no renders, no elevation drawings, no walkthrough and no site photographs for this scheme, and there is no brochure. Every image carried on this site is an indicative artist impression we prepared from the massing recorded in the promoter's own environmental filing: none of it has been issued or checked by the developer, and none of it describes what will be built. What follows is what the record does let a reader picture, and where the picture stops. For visual checks, Nambiar Bannerghatta is a same-city reference that helps separate brochure mood from evidence of elevation, landscape depth, finish cues, and usable community space.

Mythri Sarjapur is the working title used on this site. Mythri Builders has announced no marketing name for the development, and the firm's own upcoming-projects page returns a 404.

The project reaches the public record by one route: a fresh Terms of Reference application, SIA/KA/INFRA2/578619/2026, lodged with SEAC Karnataka on 23 May 2026 under Category B1, on which a Standard ToR was granted on 27 May 2026 under File No. SEIAA 185 CON 2026. The environmental clearance application that follows it, SIA/KA/INFRA2/584253/2026, was filed on 17 July 2026 and stood as under verification on 7 September 2026. The promoter of record is Mythri Builders, a partnership firm of HSR Layout, Bengaluru.

A filing is a description written for a regulator: it is not a publication and it carries no pictures. It holds fifteen survey numbers, a land area, a built-up area, a unit count, a block count, a floor configuration, a club house and a project cost, and no render, elevation, site plan or photograph. The firm has not put this scheme on its own website, and it is not registered with the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority.

One caution belongs on a gallery page in particular. Mythri Builders has three registered projects under way within about a kilometre of this land and two completed ones nearby, so their imagery already circulates and is easily mistaken for this scheme. This is a separate scheme from Mythri Sity, Mythri Street and Mythri Sikharam, and from the completed Sapphire and Signature; it has its own survey numbers and no RERA registration.

If an image reaches you under the Mythri name, ask which parcel it was drawn for. None of those five numbers belongs to this project, and this project has none of its own.

The land is at Sy. Nos. 25/1, 25/4, 25/5, 26/1 to 26/5, 27/3 and 27/5 of Hadosiddapura Village and Sy. Nos. 28/5, 28/10, 28/12, 28/13 and 28/14 of Chikkanayakanahalli Village, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk. It lies off Sarjapur Road, reached through the Chikkanayakanahalli and Gattahalli Road side roads rather than from the corridor itself. The pin we publish, 12.88919, 77.69780, is an estimate: the centre of the boundary box the promoter uploaded, whose filed corners are 12.88760, 77.69607 and 12.89078, 77.69952.

Two features of the approach are on record already. A Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board ground-level reservoir of 48 million litres stands 0.19 km away by road, effectively abutting the land; it is part of the Cauvery network, not a supply commitment for this parcel, and the firm's registered neighbours declare a mix of borewell, local-authority and BWSSB sources. Primus Public School is 0.70 km by road and the village centre of Chikkanayakanahalli 0.55 km. This is a village-edge setting on lanes, not a corridor frontage plot. A point-in-polygon test puts the site about 1.65 km outside the Greater Bengaluru Authority boundary, in the Bangalore Development Authority's planning area under Halanayakanahalli gram panchayat as census-derived listings record it: expect a panchayat khata and panchayat property tax rather than a city-corporation A-khata, confirmed against these survey numbers.

Any arrival visual here is an indicative impression of a village-lane approach drawn to the filed position of the land, because the filing records no gate, no driveway and no approach-road width.

The filing's project description states that the total built-up area is 1,90,594.50 sq m, comprising 993 residential units in 7 blocks distributed over two basements, ground and 20 upper floors, and a club house. That sentence is the whole of the massing on record.

Three pieces of arithmetic, each an estimate derived from those verified figures, do most of the work a render would. Density first: 993 homes divided by 11.03 acres is about 90 homes an acre, dense by any Bengaluru measure, and what follows from it is a tightly grouped scheme with a compact ground plane rather than a spread-out campus. Then distribution: 993 divided by 7 blocks is about 142 homes to a block, and 142 across 20 upper floors is roughly 7 homes a floor, implying a compact floor plate on a single core, repeated up twenty-one levels above ground. Then bulk: 1,90,594.50 sq m of built-up area against 44,641 sq m of land is about 4.3 to 1, which is plain division and not a planning figure, since basements and certain service areas are normally excluded from a floor area ratio computation.

What the filing withholds matters as much. It gives one floor configuration for the whole scheme and does not distribute floors block by block, so no block can be called taller or shorter than another, and it records no height, no block footprint, no orientation and no position on the parcel. The firm's registered Street project declares 62.25 m for 18 floors over two basements, but that is Street's figure on Street's land; we will not scale it to 21 levels here.

Any massing visual here is an indicative arrangement of seven blocks at the filed floor count, and the placement, spacing and shape of the blocks in it are ours rather than the developer's.

The club house is verified: it appears in the name the project carries on the file, "Residential Apartment and Club House", and in the description. That is the extent of it. The filing gives the club house no floor configuration of its own, no built-up area and no location, so its size against the seven residential blocks is unknown. Nothing on the filing describes a commercial, retail, hotel or podium element either, so an image showing a mixed-use component would be describing something the record does not contain.

The pre-launch material circulating with the intake brief lists 28 amenities, among them a swimming pool, a gymnasium, a yoga deck, a multipurpose hall, a sports court, a cricket practice net, an amphitheatre, a skating rink, a pickleball court and a jacuzzi. That list is the brief's, not a published schedule; Mythri Builders has issued none for this project. Its vocabulary does echo the firm's live pages, which carry a cricket practice net and a crèche at Sikharam, so it is plausible rather than idle. It remains unconfirmed.

Any club house or amenity visual here is an indicative impression of a single amenity building of unstated size, showing no material, colour or fit-out that anyone has specified.

A Standard ToR is a scoping instrument, granted for Category B1 projects that adopt the standard terms, and its function is to set what the environmental impact assessment must go on to study, which for a project of this class takes in open space, planting, drainage, water and waste. It is not a clearance, and it says nothing about how a landscape will look.

The first public document to describe open space here in any detail will therefore be the assessment prepared under those terms, and the application it belongs to is still under verification. Until then the only spatial fact available is the pressure implied by the arithmetic above: 90 homes an acre, with two basement levels doing the parking work, leaves the ground plane to be argued for rather than assumed. Any landscape visual here is an indicative treatment of open ground, not a planting plan or an open-space commitment.

Until photographs exist, the surroundings are the honest way to picture the place. Every figure below is a routed road distance from the filed site centre.

Read as a picture, that is a village edge with an unusually good short-range social map: three schools and two colleges inside 1.5 km by road, and lakes at 1.81 km and 2.21 km. The employment mass sits four to eight kilometres out, and RGA Tech Park at 5.41 km is a figure to state plainly rather than call near, since the road route runs more than three times the straight line. The nearest operational metro station, Hosa Road on the Yellow Line at 7.21 km, is a drive.

The neighbouring schemes set the built context any future photograph will sit in. Birla Evara, registered under K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/060225/007487 to Vardhita Properties Private Limited, carries 1,594 homes in 13 towers on 25.71 acres, about 62 homes an acre by the same division: a taller, more widely spaced neighbour than this filing describes. Adarsh Tropica is 1.15 km away by road and Adarsh Lumina 1.60 km, both under construction. Our own site for the neighbouring Gattahalli scheme covers a project at the same regulatory stage, with the same absence of imagery.

<!-- sister-link opportunity: urbanrise-gattahalli -->

TVS Emerald's Rayasandra project is about 4 km away by road, and Nambiar District 25 is 6.57 km.

<!-- sister-link opportunity: tvs-emerald-rayasandra --> <!-- sister-link opportunity: nambiar-district25 -->

An artist's impression is a marketing illustration, not a contract; elevation treatments, planting and interior finishes routinely change between marketing and handover. What binds is the plan the Bangalore Development Authority eventually endorses, with the registered agreement for sale and the specification schedule annexed to it, and none of that exists today. Where a render and an elevation drawing both exist, keep the elevation: it is a flat, dimensioned face showing floor-to-floor heights, balcony depths, service shafts and window positions. Any size quoted at launch should name its basis, whether carpet area as defined under the RERA Act, built-up area or super built-up area. The tentative table in circulation, of 2 BHK, 3 BHK and 3.5 BHK homes, is the intake brief's own estimate and labels itself tentative; the developer has specified nothing, and no price has been published.

Standard Terms of Reference were granted on 27 May 2026. The environmental clearance application, filed on 17 July 2026, is under verification. No environmental clearance has been granted, and the project is not registered with K-RERA under the promoter's name, with no pending application in the registry.

Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 is unambiguous about what that means. A project in a registrable class may not lawfully be advertised, marketed, booked or sold until registration is granted. This microsite is an information and enquiry resource for a scheme still at the approvals stage. It is not a booking channel, and no image or figure published here is a proposal to sell.

We will add material when Mythri Builders publishes it, or when it appears on a government portal, and we will say for each item which of the two it came from. A K-RERA registration would bring an endorsed plan, a real unit mix, carpet areas and a promoter-declared completion date. An environmental clearance decision would confirm or unsettle the 993-home, seven-block programme everything above reasons from.

Until then the honest gallery for Mythri Sarjapur is fifteen survey numbers, a boundary box, a unit count, a block count, a floor configuration and a club house, alongside indicative impressions that we drew and have labelled as ours. That is less than a buyer wants. It is also all that presently exists.

Mythri Builders has released no renders, elevations or photographs for this project. Every image below is an indicative visualisation commissioned for this site to illustrate the filed programme. None of them is a developer drawing, and none should be read as a specification.